00:08as many questions
00:10As a result, we're ask questions answered
00:31Please take a moment
02:57Okay
02:59Thank you all
04:06>> [clears throat] >> Good day
05:16In the meeting just concluded, the FOMC decided to raise the target range for the federal funds rate by a quarter of a percentage point to 3 and 3/4 to 4% in support of the Federal Reserve's dual mandate
05:30The committee is continuing its policy of maintaining ample reserves in the banking system
05:35As noted in the policy statement released just a short while ago, economic activity is expanding at a solid pace
05:42While uncertainty remains elevated owing in part to geopolitical developments, domestic spending has been resilient, productivity growth strong, and capital investment is robust
05:59Job gains have kept pace with the workforce, and the unemployment rate has changed little, but inflation remains elevated
06:09Today's policy action will support a timelier return to the committee's 2% goal
06:14This committee will deliver price stability
06:20Now, I'll get into some further detail
06:23Our decision comes at a time when the American economy appears to be strengthening
06:27New hiring, private sector earnings, business capital investment
06:32Each of these markers has improved in recent months and is pointing in a good direction
06:40Credit flows have been robust, particularly for businesses
06:44And as I said at the policy symposium in Jackson Hole, I would be hardpressed to describe broad financial conditions as restrictive
06:53This view was widely shared by the committee
06:57So we removed a dose of accommodation
07:02Consider the geopolitical landscape of shocks and uncertainty and you begin to appreciate the resilience of the US economy
07:12Given that resilience and the potential for even greater performance, an attitude of optimism is exactly what I heard inside the FOMC these last two days
07:24One basic sign of strength is the state of America's labor markets
07:26The jobless the jobless rate remains low at around 4.1%
07:34And both job openings and weekly hours have been increasing
07:39Unemployment claims on a 4-week moving average are running at levels consistent with full employment
07:44So the labor side of the Fed's congressional remitt is in good shape
07:51Yet for more than five years, inflation has been running above target
07:54So, our predominant focus is on the price stability side of our mandate
07:59The plain fact is that inflation is too high and has been for too long
08:10This summer's inflation readings do not tell me that underlying trends have meaningfully improved
08:14Based on the most recent CPI and PPI data, the 12-month change in total PCE prices likely was around 3.6% 6% in August
08:24Core PCE and CPI prices running at about 3.2 and 2.4% respectively
08:35Too many categories are still posting increases above 3% on both a six and 12-month basis
08:43I noted in Jackson Hole that overall commodity prices also bear watching and over the intervening period the prices of many of these key inputs have risen
08:56Since my first FOMC meeting as chairman in June, my colleagues and I have been unequivocal in our commitment to price stability and to our 2% PCE inflation objective
09:07At our July meeting, we all agreed that inflation remained too high and we expressed our joint readiness to act as circumstances might require
09:16and a good majority of my colleagues and I thought the wiser course then would be to await new information in the intermedating period
09:26Last month in Wyoming, I express my commitment to a monetary policy discipline, not to a decision
09:35I defined the standard for action
09:38We must be confident that underlying inflation is moving to our objective clearly and at sufficient speed
09:48Today, the FOMC decided that this standard has not been satisfied
09:55The committee's unanimous vote shows our resolve to achieve price stability on a timelier basis
10:01We aim to ensure that credit and financial conditions are consistent over time with our mandate
10:06That relative price changes in some sectors of the economy do not broaden
10:12That inflation compensation in market prices stays low and that inflation expectations remain well anchored
10:23This afternoon, you also received the summary of economic projections
10:28It reflects the views of my colleagues on the committee
10:29But as in June, I've not offered a projection of my own
10:32But like in June, I said I would faithfully discharge the summary of their projection
10:38So here goes
10:38In the summary's median projections, real GDP rises at 2.3% this year, 2.4% next year
10:49Total PC inflation runs at 3.7% this year and falls to 2.3% next year
10:52The unemployment rate holds steady at about 4.1%
11:00The median participant judges that the appropriate federal funds rate to be 4.1% at the end of this year and to remain there next year
11:09Inflation risks are to the upside while labor risks are roughly balanced
11:17In my meetings these last few weeks in Jackson Hole, in Asheville at the G20 meeting which the US hosted and at a central bank conference in Basil, it was evident that most advanced economies are facing price pressures
11:32Their central banks are making their own judgments consistent with their own remits
11:37Our decision today reflects our best judgment in service to our remitt
11:46The Fed has a role in sustaining the economic progress happening in America right now and the rising opportunities that come with it
11:56Those who are least welloff have the most to gain from a durable expansion, a solid labor market, and stable prices
12:05We at the Fed are unwavering in our vital and straightforward purpose, full employment and price stability, and a thriving American economy that sets the standard for the world
12:16And with that, I'll take a few of your questions
12:25>> Uh, Chair W, thank you for doing this
12:27Um, I'm Richard Escobido with CBS
12:27Um, let me navigate over my questions
12:31Um, you know, a quarter point rate hike does not reopen the straight of poor moves
12:38Um, and so I wonder how you think these smaller rate hikes will be effective when it can't necessarily address the energy supply side of inflationary pressures
12:46Yeah, it's a it's a good question
12:48Uh, Richard, we cannot affect any individual price, whether it be oil prices, whether it be food stuffs at the grocery store
12:56But what we can do and will do is ensure that any change in relative prices don't broaden out, don't have second and third order effects in the economy
13:06That's what we're tasked to do and that's what we will do
13:15>> Thank you
13:15Colobby Smith in the New York Times
13:16When the Fed starts raising rates, it generally follows with a sequence of hikes
13:20Is there anything different in today's assessment of the economic conditions that would suggest that the typical pattern does not apply? And I guess second to that, what impact do you expect higher rates to have at this juncture if the bulk of what is keeping inflation elevated is stemming from supply shocks? >> So, we're trying to get to more people
13:39So, I get to cherrypick my preferred question from you, Colby
13:41Um, this won't surprise you
13:44I'm not in the forward guidance business
13:45The decision we made today was a sober decision, serious decision, responsible decision, one that we have been preparing for and thinking about in my 110 or 20 days here
13:55Uh you heard from other people in the dots effectively what their forecasts are
14:01Uh I'm not going to prejudge any future decisions we make
14:06Uh you might have heard me say in Jackson Hole, I committed to a discipline, a set of principles
14:12I committed to look outside the window and see what I can observe
14:17Uh that's what I did in Jackson
14:17That's what we did today
14:24>> Thank you, Mr
14:24Chairman
14:24Edward Lawrence from Fox Business
14:26Um so the market priced in a 90% chance of a rate hike today
14:30You don't want the Fed to lead the markets
14:33Was this a marketled rate hike and then with that the bond yields are going up? That's one of the indicators
14:39Um is debt part of that issue? So, um, I've said this before, I'll repeat it
14:45Uh, the Fed has an enormous amount of power
14:48These are decisions we make
14:50But getting the understanding right between financial markets and the Fed is a balance that I've long thought could be better struck
14:59We made this decision today based on our assessment of the situation, based on our assessment of uh the trajectory for employment, based on our judgment on the strength of the economy
15:11Uh sometimes the market uh uh tries to prejudge our outcomes
15:15I'll observe market prices and uh and see what they have to say, but today was our decision
15:24>> Steve Thompson, Washington, >> thanks so much
15:36Elizabeth Schelsey with ABC News
15:38big picture
15:38I wonder if you could tell us just what will this move today actually do for American consumers and have to ask uh what is your message here to President Trump who has repeatedly called to cut interest rates, not raise them
15:51>> Um I've got nothing for you on uh on a discussion with the president
15:55So, but I won't make that count as your question
15:58Um on the American people, as I said in my prepared remarks, the least welloff are the ones who have the most to gain from stable prices
16:06decision we made today was the right decision to deliver on the remmit that Congress gave us to ensure stable prices
16:14Moreover, I would say because of the underlying strength of the economy because we are, as I mentioned, uh largely acting consistent with full employment, we can be focused on stable prices
16:27Some months ago, I said we will deliver stable prices
16:32Today's action is consistent with that
16:35>> Chris Hi, how are you? Uh, thank you
16:39Um, can you tell us a little more about what changed from the July meeting uh when as you noted the Fed did stand pat until today? And as part of that, could you give us uh a sense of whether or not things like the retail sales report today uh suggested that demand is heating up and and possibly threatening uh higher prices as well? Thank you
17:01>> Yeah
17:01So, as you might know, I'm not a data point dependent guy
17:03Um, so I won't I won't react one way or another to data that that shows up on on our doorstep
17:12But on your first question, I think the more important one, what transpired in the seven weeks since we last met
17:18First, I would say a good majority of my colleagues seven weeks ago thought seven weeks is a good investment
17:22It's a way to buy time so we can make a wise decision
17:26I'll highlight three things that have happened in that inter meeting period
17:30One is um I may have had a judgment seven weeks ago about the strength of the economy
17:35There's been a pretty wide ranging set of data including the labor markets that the economy has strengthened
17:41You might have heard me say that in Jackson Hole a few weeks ago
17:44It's a judgment that I have and the committee has
17:47Uh second, inflation trends
17:50Uh I said in Jackson Hole, trends matter
17:53I said in Jackson Hole, we need to look outside the window and interrogate reality
17:58Um, my judgment some weeks ago was the inflation summer trends weren't passing the test
18:03I've seen very little information since that would make me reverse that decision
18:09So, I've stuck with it
18:10And the third thing that's changed in seven weeks are geopolitics
18:14And there's no hiding from hot spots around the world
18:17And uh, our judgment about what is the most likely or least likely of the geopolitical situation has changed
18:24All three of those things led lend themselves to a a firm unanimous decision today
18:37>> Jones, Financial Times
18:37Um, you said today's decision removes a dose of accommodation
18:42In your view, and perhaps if you could share views around the table too, are interest rates now at a level that you would describe as restrictive or not? Thank you
18:55Uh I've described previously I found it difficult to describe financial conditions as restrictive
19:01I think I said I was hardpressed
19:03What I heard around the table in the last couple of days is my colleagues were hardpressed to describe it that way too
19:10Um we removed a dose of accommodation so that financial and credit conditions would be more consistent with our ultimate objectives
19:20That was the decision
19:22That was our judgment
19:22and uh we'll continue to evaluate that prospectively
19:29>> Steve
19:32>> Thank you, Mr
19:32Chairman
19:32Steve Leeman, CNBC
19:34I want to follow up on that question
19:36Um previously, most Fed officials had described the rate as modestly restrictive and if you removed accommodation
19:44Could you give us your sense of where the Fed funds rate is relative to neutral and some detail if you wouldn't mind on your sense of is there a short-term neutral rate you're aiming for and a longer term neutral rate
19:57Do you think in terms of those? >> Uh in a word no
19:59Um in a few words I'd say this
20:03Um I've always been interested in a neutral rate as an academic matter
20:10Back when I learned economics we used to think of it as a Wixelian rate
20:12It's a real equilibrium rate
20:14Um, it's useful academically
20:18It's a it's a discussion to help us think about policy
20:20Do I think it has any operational effect on decisions that we make today? No, I don't
20:31>> Victoria
20:34>> Um, hi Victoria Aguido with Politico
20:34I wanted to ask, you've talked about how you don't like data dependence, including today
20:40Um, but heading into this meeting, there was a ton of focus on the August CPI and I'm wondering if you think that um that was appropriate on the part of markets or if you have learned anything about how you might approach communications going forward
20:55>> Um, so market participants and reporters I think generally over the course of the last decade or so have grown accustomed to waiting somewhat breathlessly on a data point
21:08Um, that isn't my view
21:08Um, I was not waiting breathlessly on what any particular data was, whether it was retail sales this morning or a CPI print last week
21:20Um, I'll just reiterate, trends matter
21:23Data points are noisy
21:26Data point uh, dependence is a dangerous preoccupation
21:29It's not something uh, that concerns me
21:32markets over time will come to understand how this Fed makes its decisions, what's relevant and not, and I wouldn't want to editorialize that for them beyond it
21:44>> Zack, >> thanks for doing this, Mr
21:46Chairman
21:47Zach Kashack, the Washington Examiner
21:49Um, I'm just curious
21:49A couple weeks ago, the president uh sent out a message essentially threatening to cut off trade to certain countries unless rates were lowered
21:56Obviously, a unanimous decision to do the opposite
21:58What would you say to investors who sort of believe this is another test of the Fed's independence? And then kind of when was the last time you spoke with the president? Do you anticipate a post decision meeting or you gave me a long menu from which to choose? They're all very tempting
22:12Um I don't have anything for you on on discussions with the president
22:17Um and I'm not a Wall Street newsletter
22:20Um part of the independence of the Federal Reserve is we stay in our lane
22:28Independence is a two-way street
22:28We'll let people that do trade policy and fiscal policy stay in their lane, too
22:34That's how we can stand up here and call them the way we see them
22:38>> Brian, >> hi there
22:42Brian Chung with NBC News
22:42Uh, just wondering if you could explain who is the least well-off and what does a rate hike do when those people might be pinched by higher mortgage rates, higher gas, higher grocery prices, and now broad higher rates
22:54>> Yeah
22:54Um, it's a fair question
22:54In the macroeconomics, we tend to look at aggregates around here, aggregate GDP, overall labor market trends, the state of inflation
23:06A lot of people in Washington spend a lot of time on distributional consequences, and that's their job and their business
23:11What I was referring to in the least welloff tend to be people that don't own financial assets
23:18Call that a bit less than 50% of the country
23:22They don't have equity in their home
23:23They don't have equity in a 401k plan
23:25So, they're living off their uh paycheck that comes every couple of weeks
23:31The thing that we can do consistent with our mandate is two things
23:35Ask ourselves, is a country running more or less at full employment? And we've done that
23:39Um that doesn't mean that individuals aren't searching for a job, but in aggregate, we're running more or less at full employment
23:47If so, we can then look at the other side of the our mandate and let that be our focus
23:51in stable prices
23:51An environment where inflation is running consistent with our 2% objective offers good news because that way when they get their wages, they can put their head above water and deliver real take-home pay increases
24:06We don't have total responsibility for it
24:08But we do have responsibility for stable prices
24:10As I've said before, inflation's in a cho is a choice
24:14And today we took a step in delivering it
24:22Oh yeah, sorry from France AFP
24:24Are you looking at the other central banks and what do you think about the European central banks move? They hiked twice this year but not in a row
24:35Thank you
24:37>> Um well uh I don't ask them to prejudge decisions that we're going to make
24:41So I won't prejudge decisions that they make
24:45But I will say this
24:45I've spent some time with uh foreign central bank counterparts not just in the last 20 years but over the course of the last several weeks as I mentioned in Jackson Hole um at the G20 meeting we hosted in North Carolina and uh at a central bank meeting in Basil
25:02What I heard around the table from most of the advanced economies is they're suffering from price pressures too and they're making their own choices consistent with their remitt
25:13Um it tells me a couple things
25:16One is when the Federal Reserve makes a policy choice, uh, it matters not just to the US economy, but it spills over to the rest of the world
25:23To a lesser extent, that's true for them, too
25:25When foreign central banks make decisions where they're confronted with higher prices and they choose, consistent with their remitt to uh raise rates, then they're helping to quash inflation in their countries and there spillovers and spillbacks in both directions
25:41Beyond that, I won't opine on what other central banks may choose to do this week or beyond
25:48>> Nick, thank you
25:52Nick Timmeros of the Wall Street Journal
25:53Chairman Worsh, last fall you expressed concern that the Fed was about to make its quote sixth or seventh big mistake by deciding the economy was too strong to justify lower rates
26:04Now, today you raised rates
26:04Can you give some sense as to what changed your own assessment of the US economy between then and now? >> So I don't I don't remember the full context but I can tell you uh Nick about the state of growth
26:19Now my suspicion 110 or 20 days ago when I showed up was that the US economy was strengthening even over the last several weeks
26:28I think we now have data broadly defined that says the economy has indeed strengthened
26:35Um underlying growth is higher
26:39Uh inflation is the problem
26:43Stable prices have been the problem for now more than five and a half years
26:45So what the committee decided to do today was take an action to ensure a timelier return to our price stability objective
26:55Price stability is foundational to economic growth and I think we took an important step today to deliver it and we did it in part by removing uh the dose of accommodation that I that I mentioned before
27:08>> Neil Irwin
27:12>> Thank you, Mr
27:12Chairman
27:12Uh Neil Irwin with Axios
27:14Uh longerterm bond yields are up quite a bit over the last few months, especially the last few weeks
27:18What do you believe the bond market is telling you, especially about the growth outlook, the neutral rate, uh, and what are the implications for monetary policy? >> Yeah
27:25Um, let me speak to the history, what bond market prices do prospectively
27:30I want to let them do their I want to let them uh tell me any story they wish to
27:35I want to try to interrogate that
27:37But why did yields rise, let's say, since the last FOMC meeting till this? I'll give you three three reasons, but I would say these things tend to be overdetermined
27:47This is a complicated set of things that are affecting the most important asset anywhere in the world, the 10-year Treasury
27:55It's the risk-free asset upon which every price of virtually every asset in the world um is related to
28:00So, I'll say three things
28:03First is economic strength
28:05I think part of the reason why we've seen over the course of 2026 long-term yields go up is the economy is strengthened
28:14Second reason, competition for capital
28:17Um the surge in capital expenditures which I referenced in my remarks is real and the so-called hyperscalers are out in the market raising funding and so the competition for capital is real and I think it partly explains the increase in yields
28:33The third is geopolitics
28:33Um the situation in hotspots around the world are driving long-term yields
28:40Um, it's not simply spot prices of energy or spot prices for corn or soybeans or wheat, but it's the difference between those spot prices and so-called crack spreads
28:55What that means for products that find their way into uh stores uh across the country
29:00So, I think those are the three leading explanations, but certainly not an exclusive list
29:06>> Michael, >> Michael McKe from Bloomberg Radio and Television
29:10uh you said in Jackson Hole that uh you want to see inflation come down clearly and at sufficient speed which is a standard without necessarily a measurable threshold and the reason I ask is because uh today you say today's policy action will support a timelier return to the committee's 2% target and yet in the summary of economic projections the median pushes the 2% target achievement out to 2029 another two years and I'm wondering how you can square those two things
29:41>> Um, one easy way to square that, Mike, is those aren't my forecasts
29:44Um, those are the forecasts of my 18 colleagues, and I tried to represent them dutifully to you
29:52Um, my business is to not give forward guidance, but my commitment in June was to reaffirm to the American people, to anyone listening, that we will deliver price stability
30:05My commitment in July was to say we want to buy a little bit of time
30:10We want to evaluate what's happening across a range of dimensions
30:15And what I said in Jackson Hole in August is we're committed to a discipline, not to a decision
30:18Today's action uh starts to show we're serious about this and we will deliver on the price stability objective
30:27And as the statement said, we'll do it on a on a timelier basis
30:32That's our decision
30:32And uh uh uh when we continue our discussions over the course of the next several weeks and months, we'll have more to say about it, but I'm illprepared to prejudge those future actions
30:48>> Matt from CNN
30:52>> Thanks, Chairman Walsh
30:52Matt Eaggan with CNN
30:54You've spoken in the past about the positives that could come from widespread adoption of artificial intelligence
31:01How concerned are you, if at all, about these increasingly alarming warnings we've heard from AI leaders about losing control of this powerful technology and doing real world damage, damage that would presumably impact the real economy
31:16>> So, I've spent a lot of time uh thinking about AI and before I found my way to this post, I spent a lot of time talking about it publicly
31:23Um, independence of the Federal Reserve is about staying in our lane
31:28We care very much about what's happening in artificial intelligence
31:32We care much about the implications on the demand side of the economy and ultimately on the supply side of the economy
31:39I care so much I think it's so important that we established a task force that should report by the end of the year to help us think about the implications for our future policy conjuncture
31:51But the policy decisions that are made about the risks and rewards, the challenges and opportunities, those are decisions made by other parts of the government
32:00I'm going to leave it to them to make those th those political decisions, those policy decisions
32:04The implications of those decisions obviously have some bearing on our day job and that's where we'll be focused
32:11>> For the last question, we'll go to Jennifer Shaer
32:19>> Thank you, Mr
32:19Chairman
32:19and Jennifer Shawn Burgerer with Yahoo Finance
32:23Inflation has run up mostly from higher energy prices and tariffs, which some say are supply shocks that rate hikes cannot fix and should faint on their own so long as inflation expectations stay anchored
32:34And now that you have hiked rates, do you need to push growth below potential unintentionally pushing weakness on the job market to bring inflation down? and how do those dynamics play out given the forcefulness with which AI is driving the economy right now? >> So there's there's there's a lot there, Jennifer
32:53Let me see if I can't do just a little bit of it
32:55Um first, we believe that the unemployment rate is basically running consistent with full employment
33:03Uh I don't believe that we need to do harm to the labor markets to achieve our objective
33:09I don't believe that the two parts of our mandate price stability and full employment are working at cross purposes over the medium term
33:18So economic growth that is uh ensuring continuous sustainable durable economic growth that's the business we're in and the job we did today the job we'll continue to do is to ensure price stability which can mean that sustainable durable economic growth can go on for longer the economy can be stronger and as I mentioned before the least welloff can get the benefits of it
33:47>> Thank you
33:47>> Thank you.